The problem however, is that under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the method is not acceptable as it violates the matching principle. The direct write-off method is a simple and straightforward way to account for bad debts. While it offers ease of use and immediate recognition of uncollectible amounts, it does not comply with GAAP due to its violation of the matching principle. Understanding the direct write-off method is crucial for small businesses or those not bound by GAAP, as it provides income summary a clear and uncomplicated approach to handling bad debts. However, for businesses seeking more accurate financial reporting, the allowance method may be more appropriate.

• The write-off amount is also a credit to the accounts receivable account directly and it makes the account receivable amount become net amount.
• If the transaction tells you what the new balance in the account should be, we must calculate the amount of the change.
• This is because although the direct write-off method doesn’t follow the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the IRS requires companies to use this method for their tax returns.
• Beth can then record the receipt of the cash with a debit to cash and a credit to accounts receivable.

When does it make sense to use the direct write-off method?

• It’s not revenue because the company has not done any work or sold anything.
• But, under the direct write-off method, the loss may be recorded in a different accounting period than when the original invoice was posted.
• Kristin is also the creator of Accounting In Focus, a website for students taking accounting courses.
• An unpaid invoice is a credit in the accounts receivable account, as opposed to the customary approach.
• Once you figure a dollar amount, ask yourself if that amount is the bad debt expense or the allowance.
• Kristin is a Certified Public Accountant with 15 years of experience working with small business owners in all aspects of business building.

One of her customers purchased products worth $ 1,500 a year ago, and Natalie still hasn’t been able to collect the payment. After trying to contact the customer a number of times, Natalie finally decides that she will never be able to recover this $ 1,500 and decides to write off the balance from such a customer. Using the direct write-off method, Natalie would debit the bad debts expenses account by $ 1,500 and credit the accounts receivable account with the same amount. As mentioned above, the use of the direct write-off method violates the matching principle.

Journal Entries

When sales are made on credit, customers often fail to pay back the money they owe to the law firm chart of accounts company for various reasons. Hence, the company won’t be showing the true and fair view of itsfinancial statements if the direct write-off method was used since it violatesthe basic principles of accounting. Contrary to the treatment in the allowance method, we report the bad debt expense when it occurs in the direct write-off method. Inevitably some of the amounts due will not be paid and the business will need to have a process in place to record these bad debts.

💡 Expert-Led Sessions📊 Build Financial Models⏳ 60+ Hours Learning

Instead of reporting it at its net realizable value, the accounts receivable were reported at its original amount. This usually occurs in an accounting period following the one in which sales related to it were direct write-off method reported. There are two ways of dealing with the bad debt expense; the allowance method and the direct write-off method.

• The sale occurred December 1st 2015 and has payment due in 60days, so at year end December 31st 2015 the account is not yet due.
• This can create challenges in aligning financial statements with actual business performance, as the timing of these write-offs may not coincide with the period in which the revenue was initially recognized.
• This account estimates the amount of accounts receivable that may not be collected.
• This estimate is based on the sales and collections information from previous years and is reported by setting up a holding account called the allowance for doubtful accounts x.
• However, it only affects the net income of the current accounting period since the expenses as the result of sales that might be in the previous period as charged in the current accounting period.
• Therefore the entire balance in Accounts Receivable will be reported as a current asset on the company’s balance sheet.

This is why GAAP doesn’t allow the direct write off method for financial reporting. The allowance method must be used when producing financial statements. Bad Debts Expenses for the amount determined will not be paid directly charged to the profit and loss account under this method. The direct write-off method is used only when it is inevitable that a customer will not pay. There is no recording of the estimates or use of allowance for the doubtful accounts under the write-off methods. Accounts receivable are recorded in the entity’s financial statements only if it is following the accrual basis accounting principle.

GAAP says that all recorded revenue costs must be expensed in the same accounting period. This is called the matching principle, according to Accounting Tools. The direct write off method is simpler than the allowance method as it takes care of uncollectible accounts with a single journal entry. It’s certainly easier for small business owners with no accounting background.